I just want to go on record saying that I disagree with some of the rationale in the FAQ section. I have already described my disagreements in:
* http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0169.html There was follow-on discussion on some of my points, but bottom-line is the same: I still disagree with some of the choices and the rationale behind those choices. Despite my disagreements, however, if Access Control finishes and gets adopted by industry, it will provide a set of benefits and costs to the industry. My disagreements are more about how there could be greater benefit and less cost if different choices were made. Jon "Anne van Kesteren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To > "WAF WG (public)" Sent by: <[email protected]> public-appformats cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Access Control: integrated 01/18/2008 03:32 Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ AM Hi, To help keep us on track I took the feedback we had on use cases and requirements so far and integrated them into the main specification as proposal. I have also integrated the design decision FAQ I created because several people indicated it was a useful document. http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#requirements http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#use-cases http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#design-decision-faq Feedback welcome! Kind regards, -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: pic05664.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
