Mark Nottingham wrote: > * per-resource OPTIONS requests are too chatty, don't scale to large > numbers of resources, eventually causing developers to come up with > workarounds such as boxcarring messages I think Mark raises an important point here. Anne's response that the authorization request can be cached does not mitigate this performance problem, since the application may only issue a single request to a series of distinct resources. Consequently, this performance issue discourages application of the webarch principle which encourages use of distinct URIs for distinct resources. The WG's current proposal adds a network round-trip for each distinct URI in a web application. For tracker, I think this point should be discussed when considering ISSUE-20: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/20 --Tyler
- Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
- Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
- Re: Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
- P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
- Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
- Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
- Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
- Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
- Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
- RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
- RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
- RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
- Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
- RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
- Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
- RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
- RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
- RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
- RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
- Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
