On 2008-04-02 10:32:39 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > RFC3280 (a profile of X.509) states a bit more exactly which version > numbers to use:
... > So, stating conformance to [X509v3] does not imply that that only v3 > would be allowed. Thanks for clarifying this. A related question: Is there any reason to ask for conformance to X509v3 directly, as opposed to asking for conformance with RFC 3280? -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
