Yes, the references should be to BCP 47, which is a stable number. Mark
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:42 AM, David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Marcos, > > Writing personally - not for I18N core > > RFC3066 is referenced frequently - it has been superseded by RFC4646 and > it would be good idea to update the references in your document. > > Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > Hi i18n Core, > > Please disregard the i18n model I proposed in my previous email. We > > have spec'd out a new model [1] (based on model 2 proposed > > previously). WAF would still be very interested in hearing your > > thoughts on what we have come up with and also any thoughts you might > > have about our configuration document format from an i18n perspective. > > > > Kind regards, > > Marcos > > > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#localizatio > > > ---- > David Clarke > > -- Mark
