On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-06-17 16:14:20 +1000, Marcos Caceres wrote: > >> Irrespective of encoding issues, the premise remains that the HTTP >> protocol is not suitable for widgets and hence we need "widgets://" > > You mean that the http URI scheme is not suitable for widgets.
Yes. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au http://standardssuck.org
