On 04/22/2010 10:14 AM, Paul Cotton wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:44 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: HTML + RDFa editor's draft looks like a working draft > > Please fix the stylesheet etc. > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/ > > see http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html
That document will be updated by May 7th 2010 to use the standard Editors Draft CSS. The document that was referred to has not been updated since the last Heartbeat draft. The plan is to update it by May 7th with a new HTML+RDFa heartbeat draft that is based on the new RDFa Core 1.1 document: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/ expect something close to the XHTML+RDFa 1.1 document: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa/ I will try to organize that directory into one that has a clean, dated separation between Editors Drafts and Working Drafts. The plan is to use the following directory structure: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/ -> Overview of all drafts http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/sources/ -> Sources for all documents http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/ED-html-rdfa-DATE/ -> Dated editors drafts http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/WD-html-rdfa-DATE/ -> Dated working drafts -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarming Goes Open Source http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/02/01/bitmunk-payswarming/
