On 2011-12-13 16:16, Cameron Heavon-Jones wrote:
On 13/12/2011, at 3:09 PM, mike amundsen wrote:
Based on repeated comments about what this issue of what the browser
user-agent *expects* as a return for PUT/DELETE, I wonder if things
would go better if the Prefer header proposal was included in all
this.
mca
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com@mamund
http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me
Personally i don't agree with "Prefer" header but i stated this previously, as
it is optional i just choose not to use it.
If it satisfies concerns i have no problem referencing it as something people
can use.
Well, to make this "work", we'd need to define a Preference token, and
mandate that the browser sends it.
Best regards, Julian
