On 10/22/2012 02:03 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 10/22/12 7:26 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 22 October 2012 11:59, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/22/12 5:54 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
Where we came in was me pointing out that if you disconnect your
identities by using multiple WebIDs, then you have a UI problem, and
since then the aim seems to have been to persuade us that multiple
WebIDs are not needed.
Multiple WebIDs (or any other cryptographically verifiable identifier) are a
must.

The issue of UI is inherently subjective. It can't be used to objectively
validate or invalidate Web-scale verifiable identifier systems such as
WebID or any other mechanism aimed at achieving the same goals.
Ultimately what matters is: do users use it correctly? This can be tested :-)

Note that it is necessary to test the cases where the website is evil,
too - something that's often conveniently missed out of user testing.
For example, its pretty obvious that OpenID fails horribly in this
case, so it tends not to get tested.

Okay.

Anyway, Henry, I, and a few others from the WebID IG (hopefully) are going
to knock up some demonstrations to show how this perceived UI/UX
inconvenience can be addressed.
Cool.

Okay, ball is in our court to now present a few implementations that address the UI/UX concerns.

Quite relieved to have finally reached this point :-)

No, its not a UI/UX concern, although the UI experience of both identity on the Web and with WebID in particular is quite terrible, I agree.

My earlier concern was an information flow concern that causes the issue with linkability, which WebID shares to a large extent with other server-side information-flow. As stated earlier, as long as you trust the browser, BrowserID does ameliorate this. There is also this rather odd conflation of "linkability" of URIs with hypertext and URI-enabled Semantic Web data" and linkability as a privacy concern.

I do think many people agree stronger cryptographic credentials for authentication are a good thing, and BrowserID is based on this and OpenID Connect has (albeit not often used) options in this space. I would again, please suggest that the WebID community take on board comments in a polite manner and not cc mailing lists.





Reply via email to