In the not-too-distant-future and, long before the rest of the sheeple wake
up (if they ever do) the historic methods will have to be used yet again.
Arm yourselves boys; talking is just a delaying tactic to build up forces
for the putch, and that is what the government(s) is/are doing, slowly but
surely! Deny it all you like, but the day is coming.
I am forwarding a post from the ARA for your perusal and consideration.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Allan Gourley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; auchmore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; austand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Brett Dawson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Brian Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Colin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Dennis Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; exposure
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jeanine McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Joe Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Joseph Abram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Larry Dodge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Martin Essenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Misha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; omega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Peter Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Philip Madsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Ray Platt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Raymond A. Smyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Robert
Balgarnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Robyn Van Rheeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
b3969976 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Scott Balson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Ray
Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sue and Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; David
Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tony Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Arthur Tuck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, 25 May 1999 5:00 AM
Subject: Why the judges' joke.
>Yesterday, I sent out the following email via the "neither public list":
>
>QUESTION: Can judges be indicted for corruption and brought before a jury?
>
>ANSWER: No, because judges will not allow it and simply dismiss the
charges.
>
> (They think it's hilarious. Do you?)
>
>The reason for doing so is that, yesterday, I called in on the Supreme
>Court of New South Wales, took a numbered ticket from the Enquiries Desk
>and spoke to the Duty Registrar. I think his name is Haggart. His
>attitude was quite hostile towards me and, after some minutes of arguing,
>he was laughing and said "You are in a Catch 22.".
>Then I drove home for lunch, made up that little message and sent it out.
>It's not just me "in a Catch 22". Every Australian is a victim of this
>totally corrupt judiciary. The judges are striking out our "inalienable
>rights", one after another, in line with some hidden agenda to dispossess
>us of our country and leave nothing for our children. Of course, the
>banks and the nultinational corporations pull the strings
>Anyone wanting to find out more about my particular battle in the courts
>can look up the website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au which tells
>what happened when I tried to have the courts declare that VARIABLE MEANS
>UNCERTAIN - thereby rendering, under comon law, all loan contracts
>invalid which contain variable interest rates - which, in turn, would
>allow all those people who have been ripped off by this swindle to claim
>restitution, ie: the banks would have to give back billions of dollars
>which they have stolen. Guess who wouldn't allow it?
>The judges' joke is on us.
>It's a shame that the sacrifices by past generations to secure democracy
>and justice were a waste of time!
>
>
>Yours sincerely,
>
>John Wilson.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion.
To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe
For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
For archives
http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
