LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Sir,
I would like to know why a senior Brisbane police officer, Detective
Sergeant Michael Mageros was tried by a jury, as opposed to NSW dentist,
John Wilson who was refused a jury trial.
Mageros was tried on a charge of flashing his genitals in designer swimwear
stores - and subsequently found not guilty.
Wilson was suing a NSW bank for charging Loan Repayments at a variable rate
of interest.
He expected, and asked for the bank to appear before a jury. He was denied.
In frustration he threw paint at the judge and is now in gaol.
Which is the greater crime?
Exposing one's genitals, or exposing fraudulent bank charges?
Queenslander, Martin Essenberg who also wishes to appear before a jury on a
right to bear arms question, is like wise denied such opportunity. In this
case, the presiding magistrate gave the opinion that the Magna Carta was not
recognised in �this Court'.
Now which is the greater crime?
Exposure or manipulation?
In the eyes of the people it must be manipulation. The Magistrate in
question manipulated Statute Law - the Magna Carta - to hold in favour of an
unresearched, unjust and repressive law.
It would have been an interesting referendum result had the Queensland State
government at the time had the courage to call it! They possibly would have
held government.
Yours,
Peter H Davies
13 Hunter St Nanango Qld 4615
Ph: 07 41 633 402
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion.
To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe
For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
For archives
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
