Judges Judging Themselves.

[John Wilson]

Dear Fellow Australians,   I am suing the Crown (under the title of "State of New South Wales") for unlawful imprisonment essentially because I was denied the right of trial by jury. This was filed on 11 April, 2000. The Crown is vicariously liable for what the employees of the Crown do and, by suing the Crown, no judge can judge the whole or any part of the case.   Yesterday, the NSW Supreme Court List Judge, Justice David Kirby, set the date of Tuesday, 12th December, 2000 for Justice Brian Sully to judge a Notice of Motion by the Crown Solicitor for the case to be struck out.   Justice Kirby, of course, knows that Justice Sully is an employee of the Crown but that has not stopped him.   I have already named Justice Sully in Court before Acting Justice Carruthers on 9 November, 2000 as being implicated in the case because, on Monday, 6 September 1999, Justice Brian Sully made a judgment against me not only denying me the right of trial by jury but also rejecting my submissions that I am entitled to "a competent, independent and impartial tribunal" under the United Nations' International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as being "wholly and transparently without merit either in law or in fact".   On Tuesday, 12th December, 2000,  Justice Brian Sully is being asked to not only judge in his own cause (being an employee of the State of New South Wales) but also to judge his own judgement.   The transcript of Justice Sully's Judgment can be found at http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/html/jments99a.html#sc6sep99   This will be the fifth time I have been to Court trying to get a jury for this particular action - not counting the many previous times for other proceedings. Such is the shame of Australian Courts.   Yours sincerely,   John Wilson.