Aldo Gangemi wrote:
Awesome indeed, but the two solutions are not equivalent, because
owl:propertyChainAxiom is a regular implication (a sufficient condition
to conclude barter:wants, but not its inverse), while your N3 looks like
you want an equivalence axiom (both the sufficient condition and its
inverse).
Aldo
Yes, basically you can define shortcuts and then you can have longer versions
with more info and you can infer the shorter versions from that. But how would
you infer more information from less? The variables ?off and ?obj in that rule
would be undefined when inferring that way.
Regards,
Simon
