This description reminds me of NRL, maybe it is closer to what you need. http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/nrl/
Axel On Jan 18, 2010, at 21:47 , Leigh Dodds wrote: > Hi Jeni, > > 2010/1/18 Jeni Tennison <j...@jenitennison.com>: >> Do you think that http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/ is sufficient for >> describing the relationships between graphs (for these purposes) and if not, >> what do you think needs adding? > > No I don't think its sufficient, certainly not for the kinds of use > cases that Paul was describing. The RDFG schema only has two > properties defining equivalency and a sub-set relationship. > > I was thinking more along the lines of a means to describe the process > of constructing a graph by operations on a set of other graphs, where > those operations would include basic algrebra operators. > > Cheers, > > L. > > -- > Leigh Dodds > Programme Manager, Talis Platform > Talis > leigh.do...@talis.com > http://www.talis.com > > -- axel.rauschma...@ifi.lmu.de http://www.pst.ifi.lmu.de/~rauschma/