> I don't believe we considered explicitly the scenario in which > profile= gets lost, but something like RDFa is not permitted for > HTML5. Maybe Pete or Tom (cc:'d) can comment further?
I think you are right that this scenario wasn't really considered. > My personal > guess at a DC view would be something like "well if we don't get RDFa, > then don't take @profile away!" Yes, agreed. > the assumption being that RDFa would > come with some namespace abbreviation mechanism, whether xmlns:-based > or otherwise. I doubt the DC community would be satisfied by the > current Microdata design in which each use of a DC property would be > identified by its full URI. I think this is a pretty safe bet! Just my personal view... but I find it hard to imagine that this would be acceptable to the viewer DC community (though I'm not actually convinced that there is such a thing as a DC community view on anything). Andy -- Andy Powell Research Programme Director Eduserv t: 01225 474319 m: 07989 476710 twitter: @andypowe11 blog: efoundations.typepad.com www.eduserv.org.uk
