On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:06:46 +0200 Martin Hepp <martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
> 1. http://purl.org/vso/ns# for the ontology as an abstract artefact > 2. http://purl.org/vso/ns for the syntactical representation of the > ontology (its serialization) > > Shall the rdfs:isDefinedBy statements refer to #1 or #2 ? I tend to use the <#> URI as the URI for the Ontology, and the object of rdfs:isDefinedBy triples. This is at least partly because I tend to write vocabs in N3, which makes this easy. @prefix my: <http://example.com/my#> . my: a owl:Ontology ; rdfs:label "My Ontology"@en . my:Term a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy my: . Whereas I couldn't reuse the prefix if I were leaving off the hash of the rdfs:isDefinedBy object URI. (Though I suppose <> would still be usable as a shortcut.) -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:m...@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>