Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Michael,
A good idea.
My sentiments exactly :)
Michael, also worth mentioning RDFa, Turtle, N3?
and also any note on IRI or HTTP-bis?
can you bold the link to the SWAP publications / highlight in some way,
as it's a pretty important one.
Perhaps more vocabs, perhaps sioc, org, dct, foaf and a pointer to a
good resource for vocabs.
Could I request you more clearly separate the formal specifications from
the de facto community practice documents. The Change Set vocabulary, to
pick one example, doesn't really have the same standing, adoption or
level of scrutiny as the RFCs, does it?
and +1 to the above (re make them clearly distinct, not say CS is of the
same standing as web standards!).
Best,
Nathan
