On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Norman Gray <nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote: > httpRange-14 requires that a URI with a 200 response MUST be an IR; a URI > with a 303 MAY be a NIR. > > Ian is (effectively) suggesting that a URI with a 200 response MAY be an IR, > in the sense that it is defeasibly taken to be an IR, unless this is > contradicted by a self-referring statement within the RDF obtained from the > URI.
Thank you for writing this - it's exactly what I mean. Ian
