On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Norman Gray <nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> httpRange-14 requires that a URI with a 200 response MUST be an IR; a URI 
> with a 303 MAY be a NIR.
>
> Ian is (effectively) suggesting that a URI with a 200 response MAY be an IR, 
> in the sense that it is defeasibly taken to be an IR, unless this is 
> contradicted by a self-referring statement within the RDF obtained from the 
> URI.

Thank you for writing this - it's exactly what I mean.

Ian

Reply via email to