On 19 June 2011 22:10, Kingsley Idehen <kide...@openlinksw.com> wrote:
[snip] > Personally, I just don't loose sleep over schema.org, its a great > contribution that ultimately simplifies comprehension of the Data Space > dimension. Remember, we humans don't do well with prevention, we prefer cure > (via pills ideally) that are immediately available once calamities manifest > :-) I agree entirely - even though the motivation for schema.org is in that rather iffy ground around SEO, if it encourages to people to publish more data then it has to be a win. We've been in many similar situations before, typically where the syntax was considered the weak point. So this time around there's a bit of messiness around the semantics - but that has to be secondary to having something out there to start with. >> In any case there is a problem of translation that has to be dealt with >> first. > > Yes-ish. A very accurate response, imho :) Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.name
