Hi,
you might also find useful (to get a more complete view that includes
licenses, provenance, etc.) to check out "Publishing Data about Data"
http://linkeddatabook.com/editions/1.0/#htoc45 (from the book "Linked
Data_Evolving the Web into a Global Space")
Best regards,
Myriam
--
Myriam Leggieri,
PhD Student,
Digital Enterprise Research Institute,
National University of Ireland, Galway
On 21/07/2011 11:47, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Frans,
Forgot two things, sorry:
http://lod-cloud.net/void.ttl might provide you with some URI's for
interlinking descriptions and we have a separate VoID discussion group
[1] if you want to go into greater details ;)
Cheers,
Michael
[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/?pli=1#!forum/void-discussion
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html
On 21 Jul 2011, at 11:43, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Frans,
Please refer to http://www.w3.org/TR/void/ as this is the official
Note ...
1) Is it common practice/recommendable to regard a dataset a
resource? If it is, then all datasets should have a URI, right?
Yes, all datasets (and sub-sets) should have a URI.
2) If having a dataset URI is a good thing, what should be behind
the URI? Should dereferencing the URI lead to the dataset metadata
(a VoID file for example)?
As described in http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#discovery
3) If dereferencing a dataset URI leads to the dataset metadata,
should there be separate HTML and RDF versions of the metadata? Or
is it better to have a HTML page with embedded (RDFa) RDF data?
Up to you. If you want to be Linked Data compliant (remember the 3rd
principle ;) than you'll serve *some* structured data from the URI.
RDFa is just as fine as anything else there, really.
You might be interested to learn about the 'bigger' picture via
http://linked-data-life-cycles.info
Cheers,
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html
On 21 Jul 2011, at 11:35, Frans Knibbe wrote:
Hello,
I have just placed a Linked Data dataset online and now I am
struggling with finding the best way to publish the metadata of the
dataset. I wonder if there are best practices for referencing a
dataset and its metadata, and for linking the two.
I did find out that using the Vocabulary of Interlinked Data (VoID)
is a good way to publish the metadata of a dataset. But I still need
some guidance. I have come up with three questions:
1) Is it common practice/recommendable to regard a dataset a
resource? If it is, then all datasets should have a URI, right?
2) If having a dataset URI is a good thing, what should be behind
the URI? Should dereferencing the URI lead to the dataset metadata
(a VoID file for example)?
3) If dereferencing a dataset URI leads to the dataset metadata,
should there be separate HTML and RDF versions of the metadata? Or
is it better to have a HTML page with embedded (RDFa) RDF data?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Frans