Inevitable that usage will grow substantially. Who and how is far from clear. I 
will not rehearse scenarios. 
An interesting metric would be the ratio kb of data that could be reasoned over 
by a reasoner that takes heterogeneous data input (to tackle the various format 
issue) against HTML/XML. Clearly the ratio is in favour of HTML at the moment. 

Br

Adam

Sent from my iPhone

On 19 Sep 2011, at 15:18, Patrick Durusau <patr...@durusau.net> wrote:

> Adam,
> 
> On 9/19/2011 9:29 AM, Adam Saltiel wrote:
>> I didn't follow the links yet. But I'm sure Kingsley means popular such as 
>> to gain traction and wide spread use. This does seem inevitable. It is just 
>> that it has been a bit slow.
> Why "inevitable?"
> 
> People make their webpages available b/c the benefit of being "heard" by a 
> wider audience is worth the cost of admission.
> 
> The cost/benefit picture for creating RDF for the consumption of others isn't 
> as clear.
> 
> The HTML involved very minimal effort in order to participate.
> 
> Perhaps a useful question to consider would be comparing the effort in the 
> average webpage versus Linked Data or RDF or RDFa?
> 
> Such a study may already exist and if so, I would appreciate a reference to 
> it.
> 
> Hope you are at the start of a great week!
> 
> Patrick
> 
> 
>> Am I right that algorithmic based social networks intervened in what might 
>> have been a more straight forward uptake?
>> I think we need to be clearer about the differences between machine curation 
>> on the basis of algorithms run on huge data sets and machine curation on the 
>> basis of type categories.
>> We need to know the both the means and intentional ends of both approaches.
>> Br
>> 
>> Adam
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 19 Sep 2011, at 02:49, Patrick Durusau<patr...@durusau.net>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Kingsley,
>>> 
>>> An idea being "popular" doesn't mean that it is feasible or even desirable.
>>> 
>>> Fascism for example. Quite popular a number of times in history.
>>> 
>>> Hope you are at the start of a great week!
>>> 
>>> Patrick
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 09/18/2011 03:19 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>>> On 9/18/11 8:35 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>>>> http://www.ted.com/talks/simon_sinek_how_great_leaders_inspire_action.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> Enjoy! :)
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>>>>> foaf-protoc...@lists.foaf-project.org
>>>>> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>>>>> 
>>>> Amen!
>>>> 
>>>> cc. some other mailing lists where members continue to be challenged about 
>>>> uptake of at least one of the following:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Linked Data
>>>> 2. Semantic Web Project deliverables and their adoption beyond niches.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Patrick Durusau
>>> patr...@durusau.net
>>> Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
>>> Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
>>> Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
>>> Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
>>> 
>>> Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
>>> Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
>>> Twitter: patrickDurusau
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> Patrick Durusau
> patr...@durusau.net
> Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
> Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
> Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
> Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
> 
> Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
> Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
> Twitter: patrickDurusau
> 

Reply via email to