On 30 May 2012 11:57, Tim Berners-Lee <ti...@w3.org> wrote: > Seems to me that the crucial bit of information that the data > which is served by your site now can be got much better by > going th LoC site woul dbe nice to have in machine readable > form. > > One idea is *leaving* it in CKAN but mark it > as historical so it can be a place o make the pointer the > the superceding point. The entry could be a sort of rallying
I'm +1 on this. And think it interesting to think about how to handle this nicely. > point for people who were interested in the data. > In a way, the CKAN entry has an added value once you are gone. > I don't know if CKAN has that facility. You can definitely keep the dataset entry on CKAN there. We don't have it now but one could introduce a special state of "archived" which would then mean that the entry was kept but clearly marked as archived. Rufus > For total extra kudos, provide query rewriting rules > from yours site to LoC data, linked so that you can write a program > to start with a sparql query which fails > and figures out from metadata how to turn it into one which works! > > > Tim > > > On 2012-05 -29, at 16:47, Antoine Isaac wrote: > >> Dear Bradley, >> >> The second part of your plan reminds me of my recent question on "moving" a >> dataset >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2012Apr/0123.html >> >> The object moved (a thesaurus) is quite the same, as the cause for the >> "moving": in both cases an official version has arisen to replace a first >> prototype. >> >> We have tried to create a redirection, using a 301 code. But I guess that if >> we had decided to shut done our server altogether, we would have opted for >> the same 410 code as you! >> and maybe we'll do, one day... >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >> >> >>> Back in 2009, as an experiment in working with RDFa and linked data, I >>> created t4gm.info <http://t4gm.info>. It is based solely on US Library of >>> Congress library linked data (specifically, the Thesaurus for Graphical >>> Materials), which at the time I created the site didn't have any >>> equivalently accessible linked data. That has long since been rectified by >>> the LoC. So t4gm.info <http://t4gm.info> is at best redundant and at worst >>> potentially confusing. >>> >>> So what I want to do is shut the site down. But there doesn't seem to be >>> much if any best practice around doing that, especially when the site by >>> virtue of its listing with CKAN is part of the LOD Cloud diagram. What I >>> want to do is 1) delist it from CKAN, and then 2) shut the site down, >>> perhaps replacing it with a simple web service returning a 410 status code >>> per RFC 2616. I assume it will be removed from the LOD cloud diagram when >>> that is next updated from the CKAN data. >>> >>> Anyone have any suggestions beyond that? Also, if anyone from CKAN is >>> reading this, I could also use some guidance on how deletion of records is >>> accomplished through the online interface. - cheers, BPA >>> >>> Bradley P. Allen >>> http://bradleypallen.org >> >> >> > -- Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/
