On 06/20/2013 12:54 PM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
My 2c is .. i agree with kingsley diagram , linked data should be
possible without RDF (no matter serialization) :)
however this is different from previous definitions
Remember: if the data is not standards-based interpretable as RDF
(though it doesn't have to *look* like RDF) then it does not support the
goal of the Semantic Web, because it creates walled gardens, as
explained in more detail here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2013Jun/0120.html
I prefer a definition of "Linked Data" that supports the goal of the
Semantic Web. I would venture to guess that that was the entire reason
that TimBL coined the term: to support the goals of the Semantic Web.
David
