Ahh, I see you are (at least) two steps ahead of me. Thanks for sending along those references to previous conversation.
I’m still curious about your use case :-) //Ed On Nov 20, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verbo...@ugent.be> wrote: > Hi Ed, > CC: Mark Baker, > > I've actually been part of the LDP group; > I fully agreed with Mark's concern on the lack of hypermedia controls [1]. > LDP is based on a set of agreements, not on a set of dynamic affordances. > Would have loved to see a proposal such as this one [2] make it, > but it was then clarified that the goal of LDP was to make one API [3]. > > Best, > > Ruben > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp/2012Nov/0007.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp/2012Nov/0018.html > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp/2012Nov/0029.html > > On 20 Nov 2013, at 12:49, Edward Summers <e...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ruben, >> >> I haven’t used it (or really read the spec) but you might be interested in >> taking a look at the Linked Data Platform 1,2], which provides some patterns >> for expressing create/update/delete hypermedia controls in RDF. >> >> I’d be interested to hear what your specific use case is. >> >> //Ed >
