That¹s probably because VIAF has merged those records in its database. We are, in fact, taking that next step; I will have more details about this in 2014. We¹re drafting requirements now. :)
On 12/5/13, 11:31 AM, "Edward Summers" <e...@pobox.com> wrote: > >On Dec 5, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Laura Dawson <laura.daw...@bowker.com> wrote: > >> http://isni.org/isni/0000000124514311 > >Wow, this is great, thanks for sharing Laura. Layering some rdfa or >microdata into that HTML to expose some of the structured data that¹s >there would be a great next step. > >By the way, I noticed that the record includes three links to VIAF: > >* http://viaf.org/viaf/85312226 >* http://viaf.org/viaf/87229430 >* http://viaf.org/viaf/79454736 > >and that the last 2 redirect to the first. I was just curious what might >be going on there. > >//Ed