On 2014-10-07 15:44, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
Well, I remain totally unconvinced that any current HTML solution is as good as the current PDF setup. Certainly htlatex is not suitable. There may be some way to get tex4ht to do better, but no one has provided a solution. Sarven Capadisli sent me some HTML that looks much better, but even on a math-light paper I could see a number of glitches. I haven't seen anything better than that.
Would you mind creating an issue for the glitches that you are experiencing? https://github.com/csarven/linked-research/issuesPlease mention your environment and the documents you've looked at. Also keep in mind the LNCS and ACM SIG authoring guidelines. The purpose of the LNCS and ACM CSS is to adhere to the authoring guidelines so that the the generated PDF file or print output looks as expected (within reason).
Much appreciated! -Sarven http://csarven.ca/#i
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
