Great job!
I'm particularly happy because it shows good support for an RDFS
ontology
(http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://purl.org/dita/ns).
Lately I see new tools that mostly support OWL ontologies, so thanks a lot!
Colin Maudry
@CMaudry
On 22-Dec-14 13:04, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
Kingsley, Alfredo, Timothy, Melvin,
thank you for your comments and ideas.
On 19.12.2014 17:57, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
do you have a permalink feature that makes any visualization doc
shareable via HTTP URLs ?
Yes, we have (as already indicated by Melvin). For instance, you can
use
http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
to visualize the FOAF vocabulary - see
http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl.html
On 21.12.2014 04:11, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
I would normally expect a ? in the query string however, rather than,
# which I presume is the 1337 way to hide the ontology from the server.
Good point. We discuss it and maybe change to the query identifier (?)
instead of the fragment identifier (#) in the next version of WebVOWL.
On 19.12.2014 17:57, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
what about connecting your "custom ontology" feature to prefix.cc [1]
and LOV [2] ?
That could indeed be nice and is already possible due to the
customizable HTTP requests (see above).
On 19.12.2014 17:57, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Would you be able to make HTTP URIs that identify terms defined by a
selected ontology live? For instance, if I am exploring FOAF, and I
click on the foaf:Agent node, I should have an HTTP URI anchoring the
text "Agent [FOAF]" which then makes that node a live LOD Cloud
conduit. I notice you provide this capability via "selection
details", but I don't think most will realize its existence.
Adding selected classes to the URL is a nice idea that we will discuss
together with the above issue about the fragment identifier. If I got
you right, you would like to have something like
http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/index.html?iri=http://purl.org/muto/core#Tagging
which would then visualize the MUTO ontology and automatically select
(and highlight) the "Tagging" class.
Is that correct?
On 20.12.2014 14:54, Alfredo Serafini wrote:
any plans for integrating individuals visualization?
The number of instances is visually indicated by the radius of the
circle representing the class (if there are any instances for a
class). The number is also given in the "Selection Details", and the
total number in the "Statistics". Apart from that, we have not
integrated any ABox information into WebVOWL so far. Although VOWL 2
focuses on the visualization of the TBox of ontologies, we may
incorporate at least some additional ABox information in the future.
On 20.12.2014 23:43, Timothy W. Cook wrote:
It would be great to see meta data such as dc:description when you
hover over the images.
Timothy, I am not sure what you mean here. Currently, the complete
label of the hovered element is shown in a tooltip, while additional
information is provided in the "Selection Details" in the sidebar. As
WebVOWL focuses on OWL, Dublin Core is currently only interpreted when
being used as metadata for the entire ontology (i.e., for the title,
author, and description info in the sidebar). Could you clarify?
Cheers,
Steffen
