HI Krzysztof, > this is all about finding the right balance
Definitely—but I have the feeling the balance is currently tipped very much to one side (and perhaps not the side that delivers the most urgent components for the SemWeb). > as we also do not want to have tons of 'ideas' > papers without any substantial content or proof of concept Mere ideas would indeed not be sufficient; but even papers with substantial content and/or a proof of concept will have a difficult time getting accepted if there is no evaluation that satisfies the reviewers. (And, lacking a framework to evaluate evaluations, I see people typically choosing for things they know, hence why incremental research gets accepted easily.) Best, Ruben
