On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:44:31 +0200, Mark Birbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm worried that you are worried! :)
That's a relief then!
However, that was only one of Cecil's points. The other was the use of
@title on <link>, and my point is simply that, although our rules
indicate that this is possible:
<link rel="meta" href="OurICRAPolicy.rdf">
<meta property="title">ICRA</meta>
</link>
there has been some discussion over on RDFa about changing the meaning
of this.
Ah, I see. In other words, for the case of <link>. So you still agree that
this is OK:
<p>
<meta property="title">Not pain but <em
xml:lang="fr">pain</em></meta>
I'm therefore saying that Cecil's post is a very useful
reminder of why we need to ensure that the mark-up I've just used
yields the correct triples to support his use-case.
Agreed. It would be unfortunate if it worked for some elements, and not
others.
Fears allayed.
Thanks!
Steven
