I disagree. I think we should instead copy in the relevant part of the CURIEs spec, and then in the future we can make use of it. (That's what we agreed at the end of the last call.)
On 13/07/07, Shane McCarron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We could... I think conventional wisdom says don't make your research dependent on someone else's research. Copy it in, give credit to them, and then we are not hooked to their path to Rec. Ivan Herman wrote: > What about referring back to the SPARQL use, instead of inventing our own? > > ivan > > Ben Adida wrote: > >> Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >> >>> That's exactly what I was asking and advocating in the first place. >>> >> Excellent, sorry I didn't hear you out correctly. >> >> -Ben >> >> > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.
