Hi Michael,
Any comments and feedback on this review process are welcome, please
send them to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. You may also be interested
in the metadata that we developed for managing the test suites:
- <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL>
Regards,
Shadi
Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
Tim,
Thanks for the pointer - very interesting stuff!
Cheers,
Michael
----------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:54 PM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: Karl Dubost; Dan Connolly; Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task
force; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in
(approved) test 0009
fyi - there is also a review process for WCAG2.0 Test Samples
Development Task
Force [1]
Best, Tim Boland NIST
[1]: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/process
Quoting "Hausenblas, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Karl,
As a matter of practice, we now have (IMHO) a stable process.
First, whenever someone raises test cases (or proposes
concrete ones, such as done by Ivan [1] or Fabien [2])
the TF puts it on the agenda (see for example [3]).
We then regularly do the review & approval in the TF
(note that there is a tool supporting this process
available at [4]). The decisions (approve/on hold/reject/)
on each TC are finally recorded at [5].
This is the process as practiced and it seems to work fine ;)
Cheers,
Michael
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007
Oct/0001.html
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007
Sep/0069.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/04-rdfa-minutes#item02
[4] http://sw.joanneum.at/rdfa/rdfadebug/index.php
[5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC
----------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Dubost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:07 AM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: Dan Connolly; Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task force; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in
(approved) test 0009
Hi Michael
Hausenblas, Michael (7 août 2007 - 15:10) :
However, what is missing IMHO are clear instructions how
to actually do the test *review*.
Did you made progress on this, or did you decide of a Process?
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
--
Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
