Of course. I have implemented these changes. There was one where Ralph
suggested a change that he was not really in favor of. I think we need
to take a decision about whether it should be in or not. You can find
it by searching for '@@@@' in the document. The new document is
accessible via the usual http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts page.
There is also the comment about @name in section two, but I do not think
that is contentious. Let's put this to bed on Thursday?
Mark Birbeck wrote:
Hi Ben/Ralph,
I'm top-posting because.... +1 to everything, I have nothing to add, this is
a great and complete response, including the recommendations you propose to
the text.
Agreed. I should have replied earlier when I read it, so apologies for
the delay.
Mark, Shane: what do you think? If you agree, can we update the editors'
draft accordingly ASAP? The changes should be minimal.
I'm off on holiday tomorrow for a week, so I wouldn't be able to do
anything until next week. Would you be able to look at this Shane?
Sorry to bail on you like that. ;)
Regards,
Mark
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
