Those broken links will be automatically fixed when the document is
actually published - but thanks for noticing!
Diego Berrueta wrote:
Hi Ben,
It has been an easy review. I agree with all the changes introduced in
the Syntax. Anyway, I would like to raise your attention to a number
of broken links to the DTD modules. I assume that they will be fixed
before the next transition. I've also reviewed the resolutions of the
CR issues, and they look fine.
Btw, although I have not reviewed the Primer, let me say that I fully
support the s/HTML/XHTML/ change.
Cheers,
Diego.
Ben Adida wrote:
Ed, Diego, (and SWD WG),
The RDFa work is ready for working-group review, and the review should
be fairly easy: we've only made minor editorial changes.
RDFa Syntax Editors' Draft:
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080814/
Diff from CR version:
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080814/rdfa-syntax-diff.html
RDFa Implementation Report
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/implementation-report/
Issues Addressed for CR:
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/121
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/122
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/124
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/125
We don't have final responses from all commenters, yet, but we will keep
the WG updated of course, and we won't schedule the transition call
until we're ready.
And if you're interested, although it's not required reading at this
stage, we also have a new version of the Primer, with two notable
changes: we now say "XHTML" instead of "HTML" and explain why, and we
link to a complete example page of markup:
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080813/
-Ben
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
