On 2/28/09 5:11 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Rob Sayre wrote:
> You can Solve Any Problem... if you're willing to make the problem
> small enough,
What concerns me more than coordination costs is that RDFa in
text/html is proceeding:
http://rdfa.info/wiki/RDFainHTML4
http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa#head-681001ee6c73e87bd692e29693b3904e462fd9f2
http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/SUBM-ccREL-20080501/
http://www.whitehouse.gov/
Well, that doesn't look like a very good plan to me, but I don't think
the HTML WG needs apply stop energy.
from http://rdfa.info/wiki/RDFainHTML4:
...prefix mappings are defined using the XML Namespace mechanism
(xmlns:foo="someURI"). This is a well known mechanism, and people in
the XML and RDF communities are used to using it. This mechanism will
work fine in HTML4+RDFa documents - RDFa parsers will recognize the
"xmlns" attributes as prefix maps and act accordingly.
If the RDFa community believes that mechanism "works fine" today, I
don't see what the problem is.
- Rob
" You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means"
- Inigo Montoya
