On Mar 5, 2009, at 03:03, Ben Adida wrote:
I've delved into multiple specs, given technical examples, and even written code to prove that Henri's assumptions were incorrect.
The code you have shown[1] uses a namespace-unaware API (DOM Level 1). Using a namespace-unaware API isn't a suitable way to show the absence of issues with namespace-aware APIs.
I've spent an untold number of hours debating this issue when Henri isn't even interested in *using* RDFa.
I am, however, interested in the requirements posed on text/html parsers and I'm interested in the impact RDFa support would have on validators.
Personal taste is, in particular, *not* a good reason to change anything.
I continue to disapprove of downplaying technical issues by portraying them as personal taste.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/ -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
