On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:09:46 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
wrote:
Ben Adida wrote:
I think that's what Steven means when he says we added a way to
interpret the @rel syntax without actually changing it, because there
*no* syntax specified other than CDATA.
Julian Reschke wrote:
And that's what is incorrect. *Because* the syntax is a plain string
it's an incompatible change to define a new syntax here. Keep in mind
that "foo:bar" already was a syntactically legal relation value before.
Without a formally ascribed meaning. RDFa now formally ascribes meaning to
it if you choose. Just like microformats ascribes meaning to some class
values.
Best wishes,
Steven
