Can I use multiple CURIEs in rel as well?

Found this http://www.w3.org/2006/04/03-htmltf-minutes#item06

But I am a bit unsure how to intepret this:
        
rel (reserved word | CURIE)+

vs.

typeof (CURIEs)         
property (CURIEs)

- Erling


On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Erling Wegger Linde
<erlin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot =)
>
> - Erling
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Shane McCarron <sh...@aptest.com> wrote:
>>
>> Close!
>>
>> <div xmlns:v="http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/";    
>> xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/";    typeof="v:Person foaf:Person">
>>
>>  <span property="v:name">Erling</span>
>> </div>
>>
>> Note that space. �...@typeof takes a list of CURIEs.  See 
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_metaAttributes for the exact datatype 
>> definitions of the various RDFa attributes.
>>
>> Erling Wegger Linde wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks!
>>>
>>> Let's say I want to use both the http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/ 
>>> <http://rdf..data-vocabulary.org/> vocabulary such that google will 
>>> recognize my markup 
>>> (http://www.google..com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=146646
>>>  
>>> <http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=146646>)
>>>  and foaf.
>>>
>>> I.e. foaf has more attributes, but I want google to recognize my markup as 
>>> well.
>>>
>>> My N3 is a bit rusty, but couldn't you do like:
>>>
>>> <#me> a foaf:Person, v:Person;
>>>    foaf:name "Erling";
>>> ..
>>>
>>> How do you express this in rdfa?
>>>
>>> <div xmlns:v="http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/"; 
>>> xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"; typeof="v:Person,foaf:Person">
>>>
>>>   <span property="v:name">Erling</span>
>>> </div>
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Erling
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
>> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
>> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: sh...@aptest.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Med vennlig hilsen
> Erling Wegger Linde



--
Med vennlig hilsen
Erling Wegger Linde

Reply via email to