On Aug 18, 2013, at 19:30 , Julio Cesar Serrano <[email protected]> wrote:
> When I read W3C arguments, I read everywhere "protected content". What is > this? > Mockery? That is just propaganda to try to tip the scales towards the wishes > of > the industry. Why don't they say "paid content"? Web content is there to be > seen. Content needs not to be protected in any way. To state it plainly […] Oh boy. The W3C is just the members, plus the staff, so to impute any stance to it is strange. Then, there is a difference between paid content and protected content; there is content that is paid for that is not protected, and I can certainly imagine uses where free content is nonetheless protected. There is no mocking going on that I see (well, sometimes the conversation gets a little warm, but it's a subject that is both interesting and a focus for strong opinions). But, in case of any doubt, let's keep the conversation productive and professional! David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
