On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Emmanuel Revah <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bonjour Karl, > > > > > On 2013/10/04 16:38, Karl Dubost wrote: > >> Let's try to reply. Making questions to hide affirmation is never a >> good way to have peaceful discussion ;) >> >> Emmanuel Revah [2013-10-04T09:10]: >> >>> Why is that finding a better "thing" is considered as the only way to >>> avoid W3C's recommendation of EME ? >>> >> >> So basically, content owners currently uses a business model that is >> working for them. I'm not judging if it's a good or a bad business >> model at that point. It's just a fact. >> > > > Actually, I would tend to think it's yes and no. Yes it works for them, up > to now it's been working great. But no, it's probably not a good business > model for the near future. (In short, they need to move the web, and fast, > or risk extinction.) Could you elaborate on exactly what business models you think fall into the category and why ? Particularly, I'm wondering if you think subscription and rental models are obsolete and if so why ? ...Mark > >
