It seems more constructive to run a no-fault campaign for a change of Chairs. I have a lot of respect for the work Wendy has done. However, Wendy could have already avoided a negative campaign by spilled the position of chair and launched her own campaign for re-election based on her opinions and the direction she wants to take this group. If Wendy is prepared to bring this community group to a vote to close it down and to vote on the closing statement then we might be able to proceed with her as chair otherwise her inaction will be taken as an example that she is 'using her position as chair to stifle alternative views'.
cheers Fred > From: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:24:04 -0800 > CC: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Campaign for position of chair and mandate to close this > community group > > I see no reason to change chair; Wendy is doing a fine job of keeping the > conversation civil and on subject. Whether you like her opinions is > irrelevant, unless you can show she is using her position as chair to stifle > alternative views.
