Perhaps this item can be a topic of discussion on our next call. Just as useful would be a published list of sensible queries that would accompany this data. A couple of folks on the DAWG might be roped in to advise on these. We briefly talked about establishing a few basic benchmarks at the F2F meeting. There were a number of people there who were interested in having these, so maybe this can be the start. Thanks Eric!
Kindest regards, Sean
--
Sean Martin
IBM Corp
| Eric Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/08/2006 09:08 AM |
|
On Feb 8, 2006, at 6:22 AM, Eric Jain wrote:
>
> Ian Wilson wrote:
>> We will thus want to maintain a local copy of this extract (on the
>> wiki?) so changes in the graph don't change the benchmarking results.
>
> The data in http://www.isb-sib.ch/~ejain/rdf/data/ is indeed
> updated every two weeks, but I could also provide some more stable
> data sets for benchmarking if there is interest, perhaps with 1M,
> 10M and 100M triples?
I think this would be extremely useful for a variety of communities
trying to assess issues of scalability; the more "connected" graphs
subsets for testing, the better.
thanks in advance!
--
eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
w3c world wide web consortium http://www.w3.org/
