On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Brian Osborne wrote:

Eric M.,

I'm looking at the Piggy Bank scrapers at
http://potlach.org/2005/10/scrapers/, I think we want to create an
additional one that uses the results of an NCBI eutils query, the PubMed one is not well suited for the "Gene Neural related gene data" and "Protein
Neural related protein data" tasks.

As is, no. but the original idea was to extract subject, gene, and protien information associated with each article. the scraper is set up to do this (in the sense of spidering off the document page and calling off to other constructed URIs), but I haven't filled in the blanks yet.

I can provide the field-to-field mapping, XML to Uniprot RDF, and I believe I know what the eutils query is. Shall we proceed with this or did you have
something else in mind?

Go for it! :) I can then update the scraper then to reflect your results, use your namespaces, etc. so we can have at least 2 independent implementations of this.

pls use the wiki to keep track of this work so others can follow along.

--e



Brian O.



On 3/8/06 9:08 AM, "Eric Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On Mar 6, 2006, at 2:36 PM, Eric Neumann wrote:


I have added a Parkinson's Disease (PD) information aggregation use-
case on the wiki site:

http://esw.w3.org/topic/ParkinsonsDisease

Currently it has disease related information on implicated genes,
causes, treatments, inheritance, and pathways. It eventually is to
serve as a resource for one possible scientific scenario that
effectively utilizes RDF structured data (and eventually
ontologies) in support of neuroscience research.

Excellent example! Use cases like this are extremely helpful in
putting the various tasks in an important context. In particular,
I've related the Parkinsons use case to the following Task...

Create RDF to describe entries in NCBI database
- http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/
Gene_Neural_related_gene_data

I'd appreciates thoughts on additional tasks that would be useful in
addressing this use case.

Note: I recommend that tasks list people who are interested in
working on the particular problem.

Additional scientific scenarios are very much welcomed!

agreed!

--
eric miller                              http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead               http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
w3c world wide web consortium            http://www.w3.org/







Reply via email to