Hi Ivan, Kerstin & All --
A quick thought about "you are a perfectly decent Semantic Web citizen even if you do not use OWL".
We have found that, even in rather simple cases, it's quite hard for a
programmer to check that inferences over RDF are producing correct
results.
An approach that we have found useful is to reason over RDF using rules in executable, open vocabulary English.
With this extra English semantics attached, we can have the system
explain, in English, at the business or scientific level, how it
derived a result.
There's a simple example at
https://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RDFQueryLangComparison1.agent
You can view, edit, and run the example (and others) by pointing a
browser to reengineeringllc.com and selecting the example
RDFQueryLangComparison1 .
HTH, -- Adrian
Internet Business Logic (R)
Executable open vocabulary English
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com
Shared use is free
Adrian Walker
Reengineering
Phone: USA 860 830 2085
- OWL vs RDF Adrian Walker
- Re: OWL vs RDF Ivan Herman
- Re: OWL vs RDF Jim Hendler
- Re: OWL vs RDF Alan Ruttenberg
- Re: OWL vs RDF Eric Jain
- Re: OWL vs RDF Phillip Lord
- Re: OWL vs RDF Robert Stevens
- Re: OWL vs RDF William Bug
- RE: OWL vs RDF Mork, Peter D.S.
- Re: OWL vs RDF William Bug
- Re: OWL vs RDF Phillip Lord
