Thanks, Matthias.
Here is another "demo" page that was started off the BioRDF page:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Demo_Thoughts
It is solely focused on the AD Use Case.
Then there is the PD Use Case:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/ParkinsonsDisease
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ParkinsonUseCase
and the more recent effort to seek synergies between the AD & PD Use
Cases (synergies in SemWebTech techniques & tools, as well as
scientific questions/objectives)
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/IntegratedUseCase
Which brings up another issue. I thought we were converging on the
idea the demos would driven by and built off the current AD and/or PD
Use Cases? This is not to say we would want to include most if not
all of the issues discussed on the page you've created. It only
means we'd seek to put them in the context of the PD and/or AD Use Case.
This also brings up the issue of some of the other valuable Use Cases
that have been discussed - e.g.:
ACPP:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ACPPTaskForce
SPE:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ScientificPublishingTaskForce
BioONT:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/POMR (see
Motivating Use Cases)
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/POMROntology
DSE:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/Drug_Safety_and_Efficacy (see Use
Case context)
There is the other issue of demos worked on collectively by the
HCLSIG and those that will be presented as a part of the special
HCLSIG session at the Banff meeting worked on outside the direct
auspices of this group collectively.
Finally, it's not clear to me how the tasks listed on various Task
Force pages feed into the Use Cases, what their status is re: this
issue (Use Case support), and whether they will be directly relevant
to the HCLSIG group demo(s) - e.g.,
BioRDF:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks
http://esw.w3.org/topic/BioRDF_Top_Level_Task (tasks down at the
bottom)
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/
Using_SW_Technologies_to_Find_Small_Molecules_that_Bind_to_Proteins
BioONT:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce (see Work
Products)
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/
Create_Bridging_Ontology_between_NeuronDB_and_CoCoDat_databases_and_UMLS
_Common_Vocabulary (SenseLab, Cocodat, & UMLS bridge)
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/DesignIssues (bench-
to-bedside ontology)
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/SeedOntology (seed
ontology for bench-to-bedside)
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/SeedOntology/
SeedOntologyDetailedFollowup (PATO expression of assertions about PD)
- also a Chemical Ontology from NIST that I can't find the HCLSIG
Wiki page for now
SPE:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ScientificPublishingTaskForce
(particularly the SPE Spec)
ACPP:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ACPPTaskForce/ACPPOntology
DSE:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/Drug_Safety_and_Efficacy (Task
Objectives)
Cheers,
Bill
On Jan 18, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Matthias Samwald wrote:
Several proposals for Semantic Web demos have been made up to now,
and it starts to get confusing. We need to collect all of these
proposals in a single document in order to compare their advantages
and disadvantages, and to find possible interconnections. I have
created a wiki page where we can collect theses proposals:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_Demo_Proposals
Please note that if we still want to present a HCLSIG demo at the
ISMB conference, we should be aware that the deadline for paper
submission is nearing (early February).
kind regards,
Matthias Samwald
Bill Bug
Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics
www.neuroterrain.org
Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
Drexel University College of Medicine
2900 Queen Lane
Philadelphia, PA 19129
215 991 8430 (ph)
610 457 0443 (mobile)
215 843 9367 (fax)
Please Note: I now have a new email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
