Just to clarify, because "sound and complete" is often used in a
different sense: I don't mean sound and complete in the sense it is
used in describing the properties of reasoning algorithms. I meant this
statement with respect to the quality of answers to questions asked
within our domain of interest: Biology/Life Sciences. The former only
depends on the algorithm. The latter depends on what's in our KB, and
how we ask the questions.
-Alan
On Mar 15, 2007, at 6:42 AM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
Put another way, the goal might be stated as wanting to get both
*all* available answers to our questions, and *only* correct answers
to our questions, and both the above contribute to achieving that
goal.
[VK] I agree. Our answers need to be sound and complete. The point is
whether
richer modeling gets us closer to that goal?
