Sorry for the delay in replying -- been busy! I can see your point that the design pattern gets more complex when you move to 3 or 4 n-ary relationships. It would be good to have a representation of for n-ary's which is also represented in the logic as opposed to layered on top. Phil >>>>> "MK" == Marijke Keet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MK> This my be relatively easy to decide upon if the third one is a MK> datatype (then the situation is comparable to an attribute of an MK> association in e.g. UML), but with three DL-concepts, let alone MK> 4 or more
- Re: Advancing translational research... Chris Mungall
- Re: Advancing translational research... Alan Rector
- Re: Advancing translational research... Pat Hayes
- Re: Advancing translational research... Chris Mungall
- Re: Advancing translational research... Pat Hayes
- Re: Advancing translational research... Phillip Lord
- Re: Advancing translational research... Pat Hayes
- Re: Advancing translational research... Chris Mungall
- Re: Advancing translational research... Pat Hayes
- Re: Advancing translational research... Phillip Lord
- Re: Advancing translational research... Phillip Lord
- Re: Advancing translational research with... Chris Mungall
- Re: Advancing translational research with the Sem... Alan Ruttenberg
- RE: Advancing translational research with the Semanti... Eric Neumann
- Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web Alan Ruttenberg