The editor proposes the following agenda:
1. Review reasons for putting effort into this project 2. Review objectives and target audience 3. Discuss process (consensus and closure) 4. JAR's proposals, see http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices/Recommendations/DraftTalk a. Conceptual framework: descriptions, documents, versions, access, etc. b. Bibliographic reference analogy c. Retrieval ontology and well-known retrieval rules d. Identifiers for public database records e. Administrative options For each item, I'd like to see: 1. participants understand the issue 2. endorsement or rejection of work so far 3. some progress (e.g. agreeing on requirements, elucidation of issues) 4. agreement on plan for further work 5. individual commitments to help out On 7/13/07, Susie M Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's a reminder about BioRDF's informal F2F meeting on Monday. Details regarding the time, location, and agenda are available at: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2007/07-16_Conference_Call Please note that the informal F2F will be taking place instead of the usual weekly call. Cheers, Susie
