This might be related:
eric neumann wrote:
Almost Joanne, if the JSON includes property and type descriptions then Exhibit can do more with it.

I raised the possibility basically because it would be nice to more precisely bridge the SW and Web 2.0 notions around mash-ups. A data set from neuroscience seems to me to be a logical example for us (HCLS) to work with. Another way of putting it: Linked Biomed data + analytical mash-up tools (also would be good to take some of the statistical findings and link them back to the data set...)

-Eric

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Luciano, Joanne S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Eric,

    FWIW, I noticed that Vispedia has a export to JSON to me that implies
    that data from wiki/DBpedia can be exported and then included into
    Exhibit mashups.  Is that correct?

    Joanne

    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Kei Cheung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
    >Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 1:21 PM
    >To: eric neumann
    >Cc: Luciano, Joanne S.; Maged N.K. Boulos;
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    >Subject: Re: Vispedia: Interactive Visual Exploration of Wikipedia
    Data
    >via Search-Based Integration
    >
    >Hi Eric,
    >
    >My personal view is that Exhibit and Vispedia share some common
    >functionalities including map drawing and data plot generation. Both
    are
    >of Web 2.0 style. One main difference I think is that Exhibit is a
    >standalone Web application, while Vispedia is tightly coupled with
    >Wikipedia/DBPedia. An interesting comparison would be performance
    when
    >data tables become large and complex.
    >
    >Hope it helps,
    >
    >-Kei
    >
    >eric neumann wrote:
    >> Interesting tool to view of data-- curious how it would compare to
    >> Simile's Exhibit, which works with both json and RDF... any takers?
    >>
    >> Eric
    >>
    >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Luciano, Joanne S.
    >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
    >>
    >>     This is the Wikipedia data:
    >>
    >>     Age     Incidence
    >>            (new affected)
    >>            per thousand
    >>            person–years
    >>     65–69    3
    >>     70–74    6
    >>     75–79    9
    >>     80–84   23
    >>     85–89   40
    >>     90–             69
    >>
    >>     This is the Vispedia output.  I haven't had time to retrace the
    >>     construction ... or to try it myself, but there appears to be a
    >>     discrepancy.
    >>
    >>     This may be a browser issue too, I'm in Firefox.
    >>
    >>     What's coming out is a plot with (x,y) as follows:
    >>
    >>     (3,3)
    >>     (6, 6)
    >>     (9,9)
    >>     (23,23)
    >>     (40,40)
    >>
    >>     Here's a paste:
    >>     X
    >>     [ Age ]
    >>
    >>     Y
    >>     [ Incidence (new affected) per thousand personâ€ÂÂ"years
    ]
    >>     Age: 65–69 → Age: 0 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand
    >>     person–years: 3.03.0
    >>
    >>     Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 3.03.0
    >>     Age: 70–74 → Age: 1 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand
    >>     person–years: 6.06.0
    >>
    >>     Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 6.06.0
    >>     Age: 75–79 → Age: 2 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand
    >>     person–years: 9.09.0
    >>
    >>     Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 9.09.0
    >>     Age: 80–84 → Age: 3 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand
    >>     person–years: 23.023.0
    >>
    >>     Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 23.023.0
    >>     Age: 85–89 → Age: 4 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand
    >>     person–years: 40.040.0
    >>
    >>     Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 40.040.0
    >>     Age: 90– → Age: 5 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand
    >>     person–years:
    >>     69.069.0
    >>
    >>     Sorry I wasn't able to take the time to provide more answers
    than
    >>     questions....
    >>
    >>     Joanne
    >>
    >>     >-----Original Message-----
    >>     >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    >>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
    >>     [mailto:public-semweb- <mailto:public-semweb->
    <mailto:public-semweb- <mailto:public-semweb->>
    >>     >[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] On
    Behalf
    >>     Of Kei Cheung
    >>     >Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 10:31 PM
    >>     >To: Maged N.K. Boulos
    >>     >Cc: [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >>     <mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >>     >Subject: Re: Vispedia: Interactive Visual Exploration of
    >Wikipedia
    >>     Data
    >>     >via Search-Based Integration
    >>     >
    >>     >
    >>     >Hi Maged,
    >>     >
    >>     >Thanks for sharing the paper. It's very interesting work
    >>     incorporating
    >>     >analysis and visualization into wiki. I also found the
    following
    >demo
    >>     >video:
    >>     >
    >>
    >http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/vispedia/vispedia-trailer-
    >tr.mov
    >>     >
    >>     >Just for fun, I searched for "Alzheimer" in Wikipedia and it
    >brought
    >>     me
    >>     >to the Alzeihmer's disease page. In the Epidemiology section,
    >>     there is
    >>     a
    >>     >table listing AD incidence rates after 65 years of age. I used
    >>     vispedia
    >>     >to visualize this table and create the following scatter plot:
    >>     >
    >>
    >>http://vispedia.stanford.edu/vis/353/Scatterplot#/?cp0=0&f0=Age&cp1=0
    &
    <http://vispedia.stanford.edu/vis/353/Scatterplot#/?cp0=0&f0=Age&cp1=0&;>
    >>     f1
    >>
    ><http://vispedia.stanford.edu/vis/353/Scatterplot#/?cp0=0&f0=Age&cp1=0
    &f
    <http://vispedia.stanford.edu/vis/353/Scatterplot#/?cp0=0&f0=Age&cp1=0&f>
    >1>
    >>
    >>=Incidence%20(new%20affected)%20%20per%20thousand%20%20person%C3%A2%C
    2
    >>     %8
    >>     >0%C2%93years&cp2=0&f2=&cp3=0&f3=&cp4=0&f4=
    >>     >
    >>     >Cheers,
    >>     >
    >>     >-Kei
    >>     >
    >>     >Maged N.K. Boulos wrote:
    >>     >
    >>     >> Given the recent interests of some members of this list in
    Wiki
    >>     >> applications like WikiNeuron and novel information
    >visualization
    >>     >> techniques, this paper might prove useful and inspiring:
    >>     >> Chan B, Wu L, Talbot J, Cammarano M, Hanrahan P.
    >>     >>
    >>
    >><http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988966?ordinalpos=1&itool=Entre
    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988966?ordinalpos=1&itool=Entre>
    z
    >>
    ><http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988966?ordinalpos=1&itool=Entrez
    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988966?ordinalpos=1&itool=Entrez>
    >
    >>     Sy
    >>
    >>stem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pu
    b
    >>     me
    >>     >d_RVDocSum>
    >>     >>
    >>     >> *Vispedia: Interactive Visual Exploration of Wikipedia Data
    via
    >>     >> Search-Based Integration*.
    >>     >> /IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph/. 2008
    >>     November-December;14(6):1213-1220.
    >>     >>
    >>     >> Stanford University.
    >>     >>
    >>     >> Wikipedia is an example of the collaborative,
    semi-structured
    >data
    >>     >> sets emerging on the Web. These data sets have large, non-
    >uniform
    >>     >> schema that require costly data integration into structured
    >tables
    >>     >> before visualization can begin. We present Vispedia, a Web-
    >based
    >>     >> visualization system that reduces the cost of this data
    >>     >> integration.&#xD;Users can browse Wikipedia, select an
    >interesting
    >>     >> data table, then use a search interface to discover,
    integrate,
    >and
    >>     >> visualize additional columns of data drawn from multiple
    >Wikipedia
    >>     >> articles. This interaction is supported by a fast path
    search
    >>     >> algorithm over DBpedia, a semantic graph extracted from
    >Wikipedia's
    >>     >> hyperlink structure. Vispedia can also export the augmented
    >data
    >>     >> tables produced for use in traditional visualization
    systems.
    >We
    >>     >> believe that these techniques begin to address the "long
    tail"
    >of
    >>     >> visualization by allowing a wider audience to visualize a
    >broader
    >>     >> class of data. We evaluated this system in a first-use
    >>     formative lab
    >>     >> study. Study participants were able to quickly create
    effective
    >>     >> visualizations for a diverse set of domains, performing data
    >>     >> integration as needed.&#xD;
    >>     >>
    >>     >> PMID: 18988966 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    >>     >>
    >>     >
    >>
    >>
    >






Reply via email to