On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello Mark, All,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Mark Wilkinson <ma...@illuminae.com> wrote:
I agree - the issue also came up at the BioHackathon last week... basically,
as Tom Oinn phrased it, "if you're thinking of using owl:sameAs... don't!"
Is that a suggestion to abolish owl:sameAs?
Another predicate is needed that is less "rigourous" - owl:kindOfLike ?:-)
What do we gain from non-rigorous statements? I am assuming that
when UniProt says "same as", they really mean "same as".
I wish we would ;-) but sometimes we make mistakes, and I think the case ben
described is one of them. we could replace the owl:sameAs in our tissues set by
rdfs:seeAlso or skos:related to map to PO and eVOC? opinions anyone?
cheers,
nicole
PS: beware of the isolatedFrom property. it does not give you the tissue
specificty of the protein. I intend to remove it, because I think it can be very
misleading.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicole Redaschi nicole.redas...@isb-sib.ch
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Tel: +41 (0)22 379 59 65
CMU, rue Michel Servet 1 Fax: +41 (0)22 379 58 58
1211 Geneve 4,
Switzerland www.isb-sib.ch - www.expasy.org - www.uniprot.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
