I found it with the EBI's OLS service http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/
oh, I was going to ask - what tool should we use for obo2owl nowadays? -=Michel=- > -----Original Message----- > From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb- > lifesci-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Chris Mungall > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:35 PM > To: Michel_Dumontier > Cc: Kei Cheung; W3C HCLSIG hcls; Matthias Samwald > Subject: Re: blog: semantic dissonance in uniprot > > > On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:33 AM, Michel_Dumontier wrote: > > > The Gene Ontology says a Protein (GO:0003675) is a Thing (the entity > > was removed, but then later added so the identifier wouldn't be > > reused) > > More accurately: very early versions of the GO had a term named > "protein", but this was obsoleted because it was out of scope for the > GO. The term was obsoleted, but a historic record is maintained. GO > does not intend to say "protein is_a thing", what you are seeing is > probably an artefact of the translation of obsoletion metadata to OWL.