Totally kidding, Mark. I guess my "sense of humor" is a bit too dry.
On Dec 14, 2010, at 11:45 PM, Mark wrote: > Well... I defer to you on the richness... I am merely an "adherent" to the > originally proposed technology... it was you and your collaborators who > invented it!! > > Just pay me a salary for evangelism ;-) > > M > > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:55:07 -0800, Tim Clark <twcl...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > wrote: > >> I think we are qualified and should apply for the $ - we could make a >> YouTube video of our application and send it in. People could learn >> something - and we might get rich. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Mark <ma...@illuminae.com> wrote: >> >>> But seriously, Tim, if we were to pursue this problem, we would need some >>> form of unambiguous identifier for "things"... and given the distributed >>> nature of the biomedical domain, we'd want to make sure that there was some >>> way of resolving that identifier to obtain metadata about it from a variety >>> of disparate sources who might have very different information - clinical, >>> molecular, demographic, etc... >>> >>> hmmmm.... >>> >>> >> >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3316 - Release Date: 12/14/10 >> > >
